Processor based license will improve performance?

If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
performance compare to CAL based licensing?
Thanks.
Ram
Ram wrote:
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>
no!
|||No. It's just a different licence agreement. The software is the same in each
case.
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
|||Performance and License are two different and unrelated things. However, as
a side effect, if by acquiring more licenses (Seat based or Processor based)
you are adding
more users, then, ofcourse, the new users will impact performance.
Gopi
"Ram" <Ramakrishna.pothuganti@.vizual.co.in> wrote in message
news:ejOjuswSFHA.2304@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>

Processor based license will improve performance?

If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
performance compare to CAL based licensing?
Thanks.
RamRam wrote:
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>
no!|||No. It's just a different licence agreement. The software is the same in eac
h
case.
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||Performance and License are two different and unrelated things. However, as
a side effect, if by acquiring more licenses (Seat based or Processor based)
you are adding
more users, then, ofcourse, the new users will impact performance.
Gopi
"Ram" <Ramakrishna.pothuganti@.vizual.co.in> wrote in message
news:ejOjuswSFHA.2304@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>