Profiler and Perfmon data side by side

What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
in 2005...
Hassan
Save some counters in PerfMon and there si an option to import results into
Profiler
File--Import Perfomance Data
"Hassan" <hassan@.test.com> wrote in message
news:e69KfgPJIHA.3940@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
> into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
> in 2005...
>

Profiler and Perfmon data side by side

What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
in 2005...Hassan
Save some counters in PerfMon and there si an option to import results into
Profiler
File--Import Perfomance Data
"Hassan" <hassan@.test.com> wrote in message
news:e69KfgPJIHA.3940@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
> into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
> in 2005...
>

Profiler and Perfmon data side by side

What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
in 2005...Hassan
Save some counters in PerfMon and there si an option to import results into
Profiler
File--Import Perfomance Data
"Hassan" <hassan@.test.com> wrote in message
news:e69KfgPJIHA.3940@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> What should I save in perfmon and how do I save it so that I can import it
> into Profiler and compare perfmon with events in Profiler ? I have seen it
> in 2005...
>

Processor based license will improve performance?

If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
performance compare to CAL based licensing?
Thanks.
Ram
Ram wrote:
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>
no!
|||No. It's just a different licence agreement. The software is the same in each
case.
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
|||Performance and License are two different and unrelated things. However, as
a side effect, if by acquiring more licenses (Seat based or Processor based)
you are adding
more users, then, ofcourse, the new users will impact performance.
Gopi
"Ram" <Ramakrishna.pothuganti@.vizual.co.in> wrote in message
news:ejOjuswSFHA.2304@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>

Processor based license will improve performance?

If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
performance compare to CAL based licensing?
Thanks.
RamRam wrote:
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>
no!|||No. It's just a different licence agreement. The software is the same in eac
h
case.
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||Performance and License are two different and unrelated things. However, as
a side effect, if by acquiring more licenses (Seat based or Processor based)
you are adding
more users, then, ofcourse, the new users will impact performance.
Gopi
"Ram" <Ramakrishna.pothuganti@.vizual.co.in> wrote in message
news:ejOjuswSFHA.2304@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>

Processor based license will improve performance?

If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
performance compare to CAL based licensing?
Thanks.
RamRam wrote:
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>
no!|||No. It's just a different licence agreement. The software is the same in each
case.
--
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||Performance and License are two different and unrelated things. However, as
a side effect, if by acquiring more licenses (Seat based or Processor based)
you are adding
more users, then, ofcourse, the new users will impact performance.
Gopi
"Ram" <Ramakrishna.pothuganti@.vizual.co.in> wrote in message
news:ejOjuswSFHA.2304@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve
> performance compare to CAL based licensing?
> Thanks.
> Ram
>sql